Detroit redistricting map drafts move on to next stage
Read the full article on the Bridge Michigan website here.
By Lauren Gibbons - January 26, 2024
Michigan’s political mapmakers are advancing to the next stage of a court-ordered redraw of seven metro Detroit state House districts.
This week, members of the Michigan Citizens Independent Redistricting Commission agreed to send 14 different configurations of Detroit-area legislative districts to their attorneys for further review on whether their efforts comply with the federal Voting Rights Act.
The map drafts are the culmination of weeks of marathon mapping sessions and reflect ongoing divisions among commissioners at odds over how best to meet the court’s demands.
Up to this point, commissioners have been relying solely on population, geographic and political data to draw the maps, avoiding racial data entirely.
Perhaps the biggest question pending before the group — and the source of the biggest discrepancies between the drafts under consideration — is how much to involve districts that weren’t reviewed by the court.
During the mapping process, some commissioners have favored limiting the changes as much as possible to the seven districts deemed unconstitutional. Others are seeking more substantial changes to the entire metro region, citing the need for a new strategy to meet Detroiters’ needs.
A handful of the proposals advancing were inspired by outside organizations. Maps inspired by submissions from Michigan State University’s Institute for Public Policy and Social Research made the cut for further review, as did a pitch from the Promote the Vote coalition.
All 14 drafts, which can be viewed on the commission’s website, would mark a significant shift from metro Detroit’s current state House districts, several of which were thrown out by a federal three-judge panel that found commissioners improperly used racial data when drawing the city’s legislative boundaries.
But much could still change before a final map is approved. Commissioners have until Feb. 2 to produce an official draft House map, and the court’s timeline gives the public until Feb. 23 to weigh in.
The group must agree to a final map by March 1, and following review by plaintiffs and court-appointed experts, the court will approve a new slate of metro Detroit House districts by March 29.
An appeal of the standing court order requiring a map redraw is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, although the high court denied separate requests by the commission and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to pause the proceedings.
Barring Supreme Court intervention, metro Detroiters will have new state House maps in time for the 2024 election cycle.
The court, commission and Detroit-area voters involved in the case will reconvene on April 12 to hash out a plan for the six state Senate districts included in the case, which are next up for election in 2026.
Affected districts
A three-judge panel in December deemed the following state political districts unconstitutional and ordered them redrawn. Reconfiguring the districts could affect adjoining ones as well, causing other changes. Here are the ones at issue:
House District 1, represented by Rep. Tyrone Carter, D-Detroit
House District 7, represented by Rep. Helena Scott, D-Detroit
House District 8, represented by Rep. Mike McFall, D-Hazel Park
House District 10, represented by House Speaker Joe Tate, D-Detroit
House District 11, represented by Rep. Veronica Paiz, D-Harper Woods
House District 12, represented by Rep. Kimberly Edwards, D-Eastpointe
House District 14, represented by Rep. Donavan McKinney, D-Detroit
Senate District 1, represented by Sen. Erika Geiss, D-Taylor
Senate District 3, represented by Sen. Stephanie Chang, D-Detroit
Senate District 6, represented by Sen. Mary Cavanagh, D-Redford Township
Senate District 8, represented by Sen. Mallory McMorrow, D-Royal Oak
Senate District 10, represented by Sen. Paul Wojno, D-Warren
Senate District 11, represented by Sen. Veronica Klinefelt, D-Eastpointe
